Conspiracy Theories Surrounding the Apollo 11 Landing

Conspiracy Theories Surrounding the Apollo 11 LandingPhillip ScottApollo 11 Landing Fact or Fiction?Did the coupled States successfully land on the bootleg on July 20, 1969? Were astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin the start humans to walk on the rise of the moon about? at that place are groups of people who would have us take NASA faked the Apollo 11 landing and its resultant moonwalk. They claim NASA staged and recorded this event in a studio apartment or desert location and much of their check of this is in the photographs and videos NASA provided to the public. in that respect are galore(postnominal) reasons why they believe it was a hoax. Some believe it was technic altogethery impossible to land on the moon in 1969, so the United States staged the landing to win the race to the moon against the Soviet Union (Braeunig). Others believe it was a hoax designed just to vex the Soviet Union (Runde). They derive most of their claims from the photographs that NASA made available to the public. These conclave claims are evidently untrue and have been easily repeld and explained by those acquainted(predicate) with NASAs space programs and the science of space.The late Bill Kaysing, a cause document cataloger at Rocketdyne, is the person many would consider the grow of the moon landing hoax (Braeunig). He and other advocates of this faction guess based their claims on many things, but they primarily point at perceived anomalies in the Apollo 11 photographs (Braeunig) and the inability to view the landing turn up on the moons surface using telescopes (Than). Their claims are err wholenessous, misguided and foolish. thither are many experts from NASA and the private sector who have proven beyond a doubt that their claims are false.For example, Mr. Kaysing claimed the shadows in the photographs are not parallel to individually other, indicating multiple light sources must have been present when they took the photographs ( lace up, contri ve television set and the Apollo moonlight joke). The response to this claim is simple. While the sun is the only native light source on the moon, its light reflects off the moons surface, the lunar staff, and even the astronauts white space suits, so it appears as multiple light sources were present. However, as Dr. Phil Plait explains Each reject casts one shadow, so there can only be one light source (Plait, torment Television and the Apollo corn liquor tarradiddle). This, as sanitary as elevation differences on the moons surface, is why the shadows do not always appear parallel to each other (Braeunig).Mr. Kaysing besides claimed the American flag looked as if it was flapping or waving in the wind and that would not be possible on the moon. On the Fox television show Conspiracy Theory Did We Land on the moonlight?, Kaysing stated This must have been from an errant breeze on the set. A flag wouldnt wave in a vacuum (qtd. in Plait, Fox Television and the Apollo Moon Hoa x). According to Dr. Plait, In a vacuum or not, when you whip around the vertical pole, the flag entrust wave, since it is abandoned at the top. The top will move first, then the cloth will follow along in a wave that moves down. This isnt air that is pitiable the flag, its the cloth itself (Plait, Fox Television and the Apollo Moon Hoax).Another of the conspiracy claims is that stars should be visible in the dark sky of the images. However, the bright conditions on the moons surface and the subjects that the astronauts photographed required them to use fast exposure settings on their cameras (Than). This limited incoming light and prevented the recording of the stars on film. These hoax theorizer should remember that the astronauts were photographing their activities on the surface of the moon, not trying to capture pictures of the stars from the surface of the moon (Braeunig).As for the claim that the landing internet site and the hardware purportedly left at the site should be visible using Earth-based telescopes, it is simply not possible. No telescope on Earth or in space has that kind of resolving power (Than). As Dr. Plait yet explains, Even with the biggest telescope on Earth, the smallest thing you can see on the surface of moon is something bigger than a house (qtd. in Than). There are many technical reasons why this is so, but as Dr. Plait explains, the ability for a telescope to resolve an object is, as youd expect, directly related to the size of the mirror or lens (Plait, Moon Hoax Why Not Use Telescopes to Look at the Landers? spoilt Astronomy). This makes it impossible to resolve something as small as the landing site or the equipment left there using Earth-based telescopes. Even with the Hubble Space Telescope, with its 94 inch aperture, the smallest object that can be resolved by HST is almost 300 feet (Braeunig). However, in 2009, NASAs Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, orbiting at an tallness of 15 miles above the moons surface, captu red some outstanding images of all the Apollo landing sites. The images of the Apollo 11 landing site show the equipment they left there and even the tracks the astronauts left as they walked from the lunar module to the location of the sundry(a) equipment items and even to a nearby crater (SPACE.com Staff). Still, the conspiracy theoretician refute all the proof offered and continue to believe this was all a hoax. These conspiracy theorist have many other claims that the Apollo 11 landing was a conspiracy and various experts have refuted and explained every one of them. However, these conspiracy theorist continue to believe the United States created this hoax to fool the world. The only proof that might change their beliefs would be for one of their trusted agents to travel to the moon to witness the site where Apollo 11 landed.There are many reasons for their conspiracy beliefs, but the questions they should ask themselves is Why would the United States spend billions of dollars on a hoax then leave such sloppy evidence in the very images they provided to the public as proof it happened? If this were a hoax, how could so many people involved in such a conspiracy persist silent for so many years (Cain)? The facts are not debatable. There is no reason to doubt that on July 20 1969, the United States successfully landed Apollo 11 on the moon and that Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin exited their lunar module and walked on the surface of the moon.Works CitedBraeunig, Robert A. The Moon Hoax Debate. The Moon Hoax Debate. n.d. Web. 11 February 2015.Cain, Fraser. How Do We Know the Moon Landing Isnt Fake?. 14 April 2014. Web. 11 February 2015.Plait, Phil. Fox Television and the Apollo Moon Hoax. 13 February 2001. Web. 17 February 2015.. Moon Hoax Why Not Use Telescopes to Look at the Landers? prominent Astronomy. 12 August 2008. Web. 12 February 2015.Runde, Michael. 11 Proofs That The Apollo Moon Landings Were NOT Fake.. Ed. N.P. 18 July 2014. Web. 11 February 201 5.SPACE.com Staff. Apollo 11 Moon Landing Site Seen in unparalleled Detail Moon Photos Space.com.. 13 March 2013. Web. 11 February 2015.Than, Ker. Photos 8 Moon-Landing Hoax MythsBusted. National Geographic Society. 16 July 2009. Webpage. 11 February 2015.